Teacher evaluation (collecting anonymous student feedback on teaching) is a full part of the platform. Because it already has its own complete, step-by-step guide, this page explains how it fits with everything else and points you there rather than repeating it.
The full walkthrough lives in the Essential guide
Everything about setting up, running, and reading evaluations is in the Teacher Evaluation guide. Start at its overview.
How it connects to the platform
Evaluation reuses the foundations you have already built in this guide, so there is little extra setup:
- It uses the academic structure, courses, and class sections from Academic structure and Courses and timetable.
- It uses the students and enrollments from Students and enrollment.
- It uses the teacher assignments on your offerings to know whose teaching is being rated.
Because those pieces exist, running an evaluation is mostly a matter of writing questions and opening a campaign.
The evaluation workflow, in short
- Design a template: the questions and rating scale. See Design an evaluation template.
- Launch a campaign: open it to students for a date window, and choose the anonymity mode. See Create and launch a campaign.
- Monitor and moderate: track participation and review comments. See Monitor and moderate.
- Read the results: participation, scores, and trends. See Read your analytics.
Anonymity
Evaluation is built to protect students: in Strict mode, answers are separated from names, and results for very small classes are hidden until enough students respond. This is explained in What students see and do and What teachers see.
What you achieved
- You understand how evaluation reuses your platform setup.
- You know the four-step evaluation workflow.
- You know where the full guide lives.
Next, see the whole school in numbers: Analytics.